Serviam hat geschrieben:Wird eigentlich das Athanasische Glaubensbekenntnis von den Orthodoxen (noch) anerkannt? Schließlich beinhaltet es ja das Filioque (zwar in der Form mit "et" statt dem Suffix "que")...
Für diejenigen, die englisch gut verstehen können, habe ich einen Link zu einem katholischen Blog zum Thema: Filioque in der Patrologie:
http://catholicpatristics.blogspot.com/ ... ioque.html
Habe das hier gefunden (danke, Ralf!)
Irgend so ein Peter mit nem Blog hat geschrieben:In the Latin-speaking West, other creeds were in use; some of them, indeed, continue to be used to this day. There was, first of all, what is called the Apostles’ Creed; this creed simply states belief in the Holy Spirit, without any further elaboration. There is also the creed, or psalm, called the Athanasian Creed, or the Quicunque vult. It certainly is not by St. Athanasius. The current view is that this creed originated in Southern Gaul, perhaps about the middle of the fifth century; by the mid-sixth century it was being used liturgically through much of Western Europe. It gives a clear and memorable statement of trinitarian doctrine; the Augustinian influence on it is unmistakable. Among the matters of belief it states as necessary for eternal salvation are the following propositions:
The Father is made of none : neither created, nor begotten.
The Son is of the Father alone : not made, nor created, but begotten.
The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son : neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding.
The existence of this creed, its popularity and the clear, absolute manner in which it states trinitarian doctrine, go a long way towards explaining why, when people in the West did encounter the Constantinopolitan creed, they found the absence of such language in its article on the Holy Spirit anomalous.
anomalous, although given by a council...
Der Text war sehr interessant zu lesen.
Gruß,
Nassos
)
